Editorial Standards
How AI WorkSmart content is researched, written, and reviewed.
Practical focus
Everything published here is written to be used. If a piece of guidance cannot be applied to real work in the next week or two, it either gets rewritten until it can be, or it does not get published.
Source-backed factual claims
Where a claim is factual and consequential — a number, a capability, a legal or policy point — it is supported by a source. If a claim cannot be supported, it is removed rather than softened with vague wording.
Human review
AI tools are used in drafting and research, as they are in most professional work. Nothing is published without a person reading it, checking the claims, and taking responsibility for the result.
No invented evidence
AI WorkSmart does not publish invented testimonials, reviews, case studies, customer counts, partner logos, or statistics. If a testimonial or case study appears in the future, it will be real and identifiable.
Evidence separated from recommendation
Guides distinguish between what is known and what is being recommended. Where something is a judgment call or a preference, it is presented that way, along with the trade-offs.
Corrections
When something published here is wrong, it gets corrected rather than quietly deleted.